The purpose of the Cape Town Convention Academic Project (CTCAP) is to facilitate and further the study and assessment of the Convention and its Protocols, for the benefit of scholars, students, practising lawyers, judges, government officials, and others working in the relevant industries, including by the provision of information on, and education about, the Convention and its Protocols.
The Cape Town Convention Academic Project maintains an extensive Repository of documents related to the Cape Town Convention and its Protocols. The Repository includes Operative Legal Texts, Developmental and Legislative Material, International Registry Material, National Implementation Material, Professor Sir Roy Goode’s Official Commentaries, Reports of Judicial Activity, Reports on Administrative and Non-Judicial Activity, Scholarly Articles, Practitioners and Professional Materials, Economic Assessments, and Instruction Materials.
Use the search bar below to search the entire Repository, or click on any of the headings above to explore specific categories of documents.
Electronic registries are the most important element of systems that collect, store, disseminate and establish rights in data or property represented by that data. The incorrect use and mismanagement of these registries can result in liability and legal uncertainty that translates to substantial economic and commercial damages.
The Cape Town Convention, which, through its various Protocols establishes electronic registries for different types of high value mobile assets, sets out a standard for the responsibility of registrars of modern electronic registries with the only defence being that of having followed ‘best practices’ in registry design, operation and back-up. However, ‘best practices’ in electronic registries is not defined by the Convention, nor have international parameters been developed more generally in relation to electronic registries.
The project on Best Practices in the Field of Electronic Registry Design and Operation (BPER) seeks, through an inter-disciplinary approach, to study and link elements of the ‘best practices’ standard and to develop a framework from both legal and technical angles. The project is run by the Cape Town Convention Academic Project, in partnership with the UNIDROIT Foundation, Aviareto, and the Aviation Working Group. So far, three workshops in which leading experts and academics in the field participated have been held at Oxford University and at the UNIDROIT Headquarters, and a fourth workshop is planned in Cambridge in September 2020.
This project seeks to develop standards for the economic assessment of international commercial law reform (ICLR).
Economic benefits, whether micro, macro, or developmental, are usually stated to be the central and driving objective of, and justification for ICLR. Yet the evidence of such benefits, the characteristics of law reform needed to produce such benefits, the data and methodology to establish such benefits (the core EA elements), inter alia, has not yet been subject to systematic academic work. There are few, if any, agreed international principles, standards, or parameters for assessing economic benefits in this context.
This project provides a platform for work in this and seeks to create principles, standards, and parameters, including the development of guidelines for governmental economic impact and cost-benefit analyses of ICLR. It is an inter-disciplinary project with involvement from industry, national governments, international organisations, legal scholars and economists. It is run by the Cape Town Convention Academic Project, in partnership with the UNIDROIT Foundation, and the Aviation Working Group/a>.
Looking for more information? Contact us.